<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Release: We&#8217;re opting out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sarahsheard.com/2009/09/opt-out-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sarahsheard.com/2009/09/opt-out-press-release/</link>
	<description>The Writer, Sarah Sheard&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 01:36:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Sheard</title>
		<link>http://blog.sarahsheard.com/2009/09/opt-out-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Sheard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sarahsheard.com/?p=297#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Dear Doug,

Thank you for posting me with your support on this issue. I have been stressing here in Canada the very point you raised — that Google&#039;s removing content from display is not the same as excising the digitized file from its vault.  The entire opting-out process may have to be revisited should the Google Settlement be rejected. How can rights-holders opt out of a draft settlement that has been rejected by the court?
You have every right, it seems to me, to ask that your intellectual property be removed entirely from Google&#039;s possession. The persistence of individuals like you will help halt this Borg-like corporation from appropriating and marketing the creative property of others without permission.

In solidarity,
Sarah Sheard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Doug,</p>
<p>Thank you for posting me with your support on this issue. I have been stressing here in Canada the very point you raised — that Google&#8217;s removing content from display is not the same as excising the digitized file from its vault.  The entire opting-out process may have to be revisited should the Google Settlement be rejected. How can rights-holders opt out of a draft settlement that has been rejected by the court?<br />
You have every right, it seems to me, to ask that your intellectual property be removed entirely from Google&#8217;s possession. The persistence of individuals like you will help halt this Borg-like corporation from appropriating and marketing the creative property of others without permission.</p>
<p>In solidarity,<br />
Sarah Sheard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Fevens</title>
		<link>http://blog.sarahsheard.com/2009/09/opt-out-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Fevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sarahsheard.com/?p=297#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thank you Sarah for your work in the “Google matter”.  I am a &quot;pretend author and researcher&quot; who has his own battle – I’ve been Googled! - with the partnership of Google Inc. &amp; The University of Wisconsin.  They digitized without my authorization my &quot;Fevens, a family history&quot; in 2008. I refused to go to their web site and &quot;opt out&quot; of their program, because, I felt to do so would send the signal that I condone their, what I feel, was illegal infringement of my registered copyright. Instead I have been writing letters and emails, which through my persistence removed my book from displaying at Google Books.  However I am still waiting for written confirmation that all of the digital files from this illegal activity have been destroyed.  As I expect a university library to act with more respect for copyright law, I have asked the University of Wisconsin for an apology regarding this infringement of my copyright. 
Kind Regards,
Douglas Fevens
&quot;The University of Wisconsin, Google &amp; Me&quot;
www.facebook.com/douglas.fevens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Sarah for your work in the “Google matter”.  I am a &#8220;pretend author and researcher&#8221; who has his own battle – I’ve been Googled! &#8211; with the partnership of Google Inc. &amp; The University of Wisconsin.  They digitized without my authorization my &#8220;Fevens, a family history&#8221; in 2008. I refused to go to their web site and &#8220;opt out&#8221; of their program, because, I felt to do so would send the signal that I condone their, what I feel, was illegal infringement of my registered copyright. Instead I have been writing letters and emails, which through my persistence removed my book from displaying at Google Books.  However I am still waiting for written confirmation that all of the digital files from this illegal activity have been destroyed.  As I expect a university library to act with more respect for copyright law, I have asked the University of Wisconsin for an apology regarding this infringement of my copyright.<br />
Kind Regards,<br />
Douglas Fevens<br />
&#8220;The University of Wisconsin, Google &amp; Me&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/douglas.fevens" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/douglas.fevens</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

